|
|
|
|
Home / Archives / Vol. 13 No. 2 (2017): JUL - DEC / Original Article |
|
|
|
|
|
Development of Clinical Immunology Service System at Taksin Hospital for same day results |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
นภาพร กู้เกียรตินันท์
Clinical Immunology section, Central Laboratory Department, Taksin Hospital, Office of Medical Services, Bangkok Metropolitan Administration
Abstract
Introduction : The major work of clinical immunology section is to determine the immunological substances in serum using immunological assays. The clinical assessment done in our section comprises HIV infection, hepatitis virus infection, syphilis, tumor markers and hormones. Our section is supplied with advanced instruments in order to produce accurate and reliable outcome. In addition, the rapid result is one of the most important services to support and assist the physicians in terms of diagnosis, prognosis and treatment.
Objective : This study is to develop our service system for same day results.
Methodology : The research and development was conducted in Clinical Immunology section, Central Laboratory Department, Taksin Hospital. From June to December 2014. By increasing times of specimen reception, using two fully automatic instruments, performing internal quality control by OPSpecs chart to select a suitable rule to allow for error detection with low false rejection.
Results : The 6,922 specimens were requested for same day results and 6,913 (99.87 %) could be accomplished. About satisfaction evaluation, 86 % of clients expressed moderate to much appreciation.
Conclusion : The results from this study indicated the increasing capability of our service system and it could be used for continuous development in our laboratory in order to make more satisfaction to clients.
Keywords : Clinical Immunology service system, same day results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
How to Cite |
|
|
|
|
|
กู้เกียรตินันท์ น. (2017). Development of Clinical Immunology Service System at Taksin Hospital for same day results. Journal of Charoenkrung Pracharak Hospital, 13(2), 60–73. Retrieved from https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JCP/article/view/179058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
References
1. Valdiserri RO, Moore M, Gerber AR, Campbell CH, Dillon BA, West GR. A study of clients returning for counseling after HIV testing: implications for improving rates of return. Public Health Rep 1993; 108(1): 12-8.
2. CLIA proficiency testing criteria for acceptable analytical performance, as printed in the Federal Register February 28, 1992; 57(40): 7002-186. These guidelines for acceptable performance can be used as Analytical Quality Requirements in the Westgard QC Design and Planning process. Available at http:// www.westgard.com/clia.htm.
3. Park IU, Chow JM, Bolan G, Stanleg M, Shieh J, Schapiro JM. Screening for syphilis with treponemal immunoassay: Analysis of discordant serology results and implications for clinical management. J Infect Dis 2011; 204(9): 1297-304.
4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Syphilis Testing Algorithms Using Treponemal Tests for Initial screening - Four Laboratories, New York City, 2005-2006. MMWR 2008; 57(32): 872-5.
5. World Health Organization. Service delivery approaches to HIV testing and counselling (HTC): A strategic HTC programme framework. Available at http://www.who.int. Retrieved July, 2012.
6. Westgard S, Sirisali K, Manochiopinj S, Sirisali S. Rejection (error) rates in a Thai laboratory. Available at http://james.westgard.com/the_westgard_rules/2011/09/error-rates-thai- laboratory.html. Retrieved April 3, 2013. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|